DINOWEB - dinosaurs web-site  

Complete Data Base of Paleozoic and Mesozoic Tetrapods.
Paleo-News and illustrations. Big electronic PDF-library.

line decor
line decor

Download PDF Paleolibrary


?????????? ?????????
сайт о динозаврах
??????? ?????????

рейтинг сайтов
Free Hit Counters

Free Counter
hit counter javascript

myspace hit counter
Powered by counter.bloke.com

Locations of visitors to this page


Dinosaurs of the Taiga (botany for paleoartists part VII)

December 30 , 2016:

by Maija Karala

Back at the time, many people considered the Mesozoic world a constant tropical hothouse, with little variation on climate. Dinosaurs were portrayed as great lizards that required tropical climates to thrive.

Arctic dinosaurs give one more killing blow to that already pretty old-fashioned concept. They lived in a cold climate well beyond the Arctic circle – and apparently thrived. But what was their world like?

I recently wrote a newspaper article on the newly described Alaskan hadrosaur Ugrunaaluk kuukpikensis. For that, I read a bunch of papers about the flora and climate or Cretaceous Arctic. I also contacted paleoclimatologist Carla Tomsich from the University of Alaska, who turned out to be an incredibly helpful and nice person. Here’s what I learned about Ugrunaaluk‘s world.

Ugrunaaluk was found from the Prince Creek Formation in the Alaskan North Slope. That is, it lived in the Maastrician epoch, about 69 million years ago. The area is now the northernmost plains of Alaska, sloping down into the Arctic Ocean. Ugrunaaluk coexisted with Troodon, Pachyrhinosaurus, the dwarf tyrannosaur Nanuqsaurus, and a variety of other dinosaurs.

Back in the Maastrichian, the area would have been even further north than it is today. It’s is estimated at 80 to 85 °N, which means the latitude of Svalbard at minimum, and perhaps halfway towards the North Pole again.

Extreme north does not necessarily mean extreme cold, though. Even though the Earth’s climate had been cooling for millions of years, Maastrichian was still a global hothouse compared to today’s world. The annual mean temperature of Prince Creek area was around + 2,5 to 5 °C, which corresponds to Southern Finland. The annual average of Helsinki, where I am at the moment of writing this, is + 4,8 °C.

The Maastrichian Arctic, then, was a combination of high latitude and relatively warm temperatures completely unknown in today’s world. Polar night lasted from October to February each year, and was then countered by midnight sun during the summer.

There might have not been that much literal midnight sunshine, however. Alexei Herman and Robert Spicer suggest there was a permanent polar cloud cap that only rarely if ever broke. This would prevent the tropics from overheating during such a warm climate.

Combined with the proximity of the Arctic Ocean, this means the temperature range within a year was pretty small. Winters were mild and summers cool. Though the average temperature was just barely above zero, freezing weathers might not have been long or severe. Indeed, there are no signs of glaciation or boulders moved around by ice.

Despite mildness, it was cold and cloudy enough that ectothermic reptiles are unknown from the area. There are no crocodilians, champsosaurs, snakes, lizards, or turtles known from North Slope. In today’s world, lizards and snakes live well north of the Arctic Circle, but they are absolutely dependent of direct sunlight to aquire body heat. If the permanent cloud cap really existed, it might have been the reason why even the most cold-hardy reptiles simply aren’t there.
Wet and green

Under the cloud cap, it was a grey, wet and lush world. It was rainy – estimated at around 500 to 1500 mm per year. Coal deposits in the sediments tell a tale of ancient swamps. While productivity seems to have been high, plant diversity was low. That is, few plants tolerated these odd conditions, but those that did, grew vigorously.

On a first glance, Maastrichian Northern Alaska might have pretty closely resembled modern taiga. Taiga are the conifer-dominated woodlands that cover much of the cool temperate landmasses. Specifically, it resembled the northern parts of the taiga. There were small and widely spaced trees and plenty of swamps. You can see this kind of vegetation in, for example, middle parts of modern Alaska, or in Finnish Lapland.

The dominant tree was Parataxodium wigginsii, a deciduous conifer closely related to modern dawn redwood (Metasequoia). It wasn’t particularly large: the trunk girth of mature trees is estimated to be just 20 cm (or a bit less than eight inches). Most conifers in these latitudes probably shed their needles in the autumn, but there might have also been some juniper-like evergreen species. There were plenty of ferns and horsetails in the undergrowth.

While angiosperms, or flowering plants, were already hugely diverse in more benign climates at the time (such as Hell Creek, the home of Tyrannosaurus rex), they apparently still weren’t quite ready to tackle the Arctic. There are exactly three types of flowering plant leaf fossils known from North Slope: probably one shrub, one aquatic floating plant, and one vine.

However, the fossil pollen record tells a slightly different story. There are pollen types of at least three flowering plant families, one of which (called Aquilapollenites) occurs in a great diversity. It’s, however, unknown what kinds of plants exactly they come from. Carla Tomsich suggested they are probably from small, herbaceous weed-like plants that don’t shed their leaves but die off completely in the autumn, overwintering either as seeds or underground growths. These plants wilt so fast they rarely fossilize.

Apparently, Arctic dinosaurs walked through flowers during the spring and summer, though we don’t know what the flowers looked like. Many were probably insect-pollinated, though, which suggests they were pretty to attract the attention of their pollinators. Modern polar areas are rich with tiny, but beautiful flowering plants. Perhaps North Slope was similar.

Herman, Spicer & Spicer (2015) give some fascinating bits of educated guesswork in their new paper. They suggest that when the sun finally came up after the long polar night, plants did not need to wait for temperatures to rise (it was fairly mild year-round), but started growing immediately. This would have placed spring bud break around late February to early March.

However, the weather was unpredictable. Ground frosts, even snowfalls were possible into late March. Even throughout the summer, growth rings of fossil trees show signs of sudden cold periods when temperature dropped below + 10 or even below + 5 °C. This was probably not much of a problem for the cold-adapted plants, but might have given some additional challenge to nesting dinosaurs.

North Slope was, then, both foreign and oddly familiar to someone living in the northern latitudes. It’s a testament to the incredible adaptability of dinosaurs – and an interesting artistic inspiration.


References and further reading:

Spicer & Herman 2010: The Late Cretaceous environment of the Arctic: A quantitative reassessment based on plant fossils. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology.

Herman, Spicer & Spicer 2015: Environmental constraints on terrestrial vertebrate behaviour and reproduction in the high Arctic of the Late Cretaceous. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology.



Hosted by uCoz